Paul Nicholls great value but Gordon Elliott spat was nothing compared to Martin Pipe rivalry

Summarized by: Live Sports Direct
 
Paul Nicholls great value but Gordon Elliott spat was nothing compared to Martin Pipe rivalry

Gordon Elliott had a dig at the top trainers. Paul Nicholls thinks it was a load of bull****. Martin Pipe and Gordon Elliott have a rivalry. It's nothing compared to it.

William Hill offers Paul Nicholls great value and Gordon Elliott spat nothing compared to Martin Pipe rivalry.

Betfair offers £10 get £30 and £20 get it back as cash if it loses.

Sky Bet offers £30 in free bets on Racing.

Paul Nicholls is great value. Gordon Elliott spat was nothing compared to Martin Pipe rivalry. Bet £5 get £20 at Ladbrokes.

Coral offers £20 off a bet of £5. William Hill offers a £30 bonus. Sky Bet offers 3 x £10 bet tokens. Paddy Power offers the first bet at min 2.0 odds and a cash refund. Ladbrokes offers free bets for new customers. Nicholls and Martin Pipe are competitive trainers. Hendo and Henderson had a spat at Ascot. Nicholl's horse Neptune Collonges won the 2012 Grand National. He said it was a victory for him. Martin Pippen said he didn't win anything when the horses were in their stables.

Constantitution Hill has won the Supreme at Cheltenham Festival and the Fighting Fifth in last Saturday's Fighting Five. He's fast and low over hurdles and he's got the boffins at Timeform pretty jiggy. Martin Pipe and Paul Nicholls had a rivalry. Nicholl's finished second to Pipe for seven seasons straight, from 1998-99 to 2004-05. Pipe stole the limelight on the final day of the season and announced his retirement. He also swerved across Nichol's See More Business in the Gold Cup and it made him angry. In his book, Nicholi admits he wishes he'd punched Pipe.

Remember to gamble responsibly. Establishes time and monetary limits before playing. Only gambles with money they can afford to lose. Never chases their losses.

Establishes time and monetary limits before playing. Gambling only with money they can afford to lose.


IN THIS ARTICLE