Nottingham Forest believe Premier League is punishing ambition
With the points deduction, Forest’s ownership feels they are being punished for showing ambition. When Forest were promoted, there seemed a general mood of support from other Premier League clubs – until Marinakis started spending.
The narrative of “great to have them back” quickly turned darker.
Admittedly, Forest signed too many players – some never even kicked a ball for the club – but had to build a new team after promotion. They argue that spending ahead of revenue was unavoidable.
Along with Everton, Forest were charged on Jan 15. Throughout the process, Forest were determined to maintain a conciliatory tone and avoid antagonising the Premier League. Indeed, they were even advised by high-ranking officials to play nicely as it would reflect well on them.
When Everton were charged with their first breach in March last year, the club swiftly issued a statement insisting they “strongly” contested the allegation and would “robustly defend its position to the commission”.
Forest concluded that adopting a similar combative stance would not do them any favours.
Marinakis was persuaded to stay silent on the matter. The club admitted the breach and continued to remain transparent with the league, providing financial accounts and other information.
In the written reasons, it is confirmed that Forest effectively avoided a further two-point deduction through “exceptional co-operation”.
Nick De Marco KC, a renowned sports lawyer, was appointed to fight their defence.
De Marco successfully defended Harry Toffolo from a ban over betting charges last year and has previously worked with Forest before. He has also defended Derby County, Sheffield Wednesday and, most recently, Leicester City in disciplinary proceedings.
Forest’s “virtual” hearing was held on March 7 and 8. In attendance were key figures such as De Marco, Forest’s finance director Tom Bonser and director Ioannis Vrentzos.
Forest were hopeful of a minimal sanction, from two to three points. They felt their defence was good, and the argument over Brennan Johnson’s sale was entirely in line with profitability and sustainability.
